Analysis of the Poem.
A stone wall separates
the speaker’s property from his neighbour’s. In every spring season the poet
finds the wall broken. He informs his neighbour who lives across the hill. The
two meets on a day to walk on either side of the wall and jointly make repairs.
So Spring is a mending time.
The poet does not know
what bring the wall down. He says that there is something that doesn’t love the
wall. He believes that it may be the work of the rabbit hunters or tremors of
frozen ground. Every year they find the wall damaged and together they make
repairs.
In some places the speaker sees no reason for the wall to be kept—there are no cows to be contained, just apple and pine trees. He does not believe in walls for the sake of walls.
The neighbour resorts to an old adage: “Good fences make good
neighbors.” The speaker remains unconvinced and mischievously presses the
neighbor to look beyond the old-fashioned folly of such reasoning. His neighbour
will not be swayed. The speaker thinks that his neighbour is from a justifiably
outmoded era, a living example of a dark-age mentality.
The image at the heart of “Mending Wall” is a interesting : two men meeting on terms of civility and neighborliness to build a barrier between them. They do so out of tradition, out of habit. Yet the very earth conspires against them and makes their task Sisyphean.
Sisyphus is the figure in Greek mythology condemned perpetually to push a boulder up a hill, only to have the boulder roll down again.
These men push boulders back on top
of the wall; yet just as inevitably, whether at the hand of hunters or elves,
or the frost and thaw of nature’s invisible hand, the boulders tumble down
again. Still, the neighbors persist. The poem, thus, seems to meditate
conventionally on three grand themes: barrier-building (segregation, in the
broadest sense of the word), the doomed nature of this enterprise, and our
persistence in this activity regardless.
The speaker would have us believe that there are two types of people: those who stubbornly insist on building superfluous walls and those who would dispense with this practice — wall-builders and wall-breakers. The orthodox and radicals, who does not want change and those that want changes.
The speaker may scorn his neighbour’s obstinate wall-building, may observe the activity with humorous detachment, but he himself goes to the wall at all times of the year to mend the damage done by hunters; it is the speaker who contacts the neighbor at wall-mending time to set the annual appointment.
The speaker says he sees no need for a wall here,
but this implies that there may be a need for a wall elsewhere— “where there
are cows,” for example. The speaker also derives some satisfaction, out of the exercise
of wall-building. This wall-building act
seems ancient, for it is described in ritual terms. It involves “spells” to
counteract the “elves,” and the neighbor appears a Stone-Age savage while he
hoists and transports a boulder.
There are different types of wall that exists in the society. Walls of religious, political, racial, cultural, economic and geographical nature that segregate people.